Parsha Insights Miketz 2006

Genesis 42:

כו וַיִּשְׂאוּ אֶת-שִׁבְרָם, עַל-חֲמֹרֵיהֶם; וַיֵּלְכוּ, מִשָּׁם. כז וַיִּפְתַּח הָאֶחָד אֶת-שַׂקּוֹ, לָתֵת מִסְפּוֹא לַחֲמֹרוֹ
בַּמָּלוֹן; וַיַּרְא, אֶת-כַּסְפּוֹ, וְהִנֵּה-הוּא, בְּפִי אַמְתַּחְתּוֹ. כח וַיֹּאמֶר אֶל-אֶחָיו הוּשַׁב כַּסְפִּי, וְגַם הִנֵּה בְאַמְתַּחְתִּי; וַיֵּצֵא לִבָּם, וַיֶּחֶרְדוּ אִישׁ אֶל-אָחִיו לֵאמֹר, מַה-זֹּאת עָשָׂה אֱלֹהִים, לָנוּ. כט וַיָּבֹאוּ אֶל-יַעֲקֹב אֲבִיהֶם, אַרְצָה כְּנָעַן; וַיַּגִּידוּ לוֹ, אֵת כָּל-הַקֹּרֹת אֹתָם לֵאמֹר.
...........
לה וַיְהִי, הֵם מְרִיקִים שַׂקֵּיהֶם, וְהִנֵּה-אִישׁ צְרוֹר-כַּסְפּוֹ, בְּשַׂקּוֹ; וַיִּרְאוּ אֶת-צְרֹרוֹת כַּסְפֵּיהֶם, הֵמָּה וַאֲבִיהֶם--וַיִּירָאוּ

Since Yosef’s brothers had already discovered at the lodge that their money had been returned, why were they so surprised to see it at their father’s house? One answer is that at the lodge only one brother opened his sack. While that fits into the text, the story still reads quite strangely. A better answer is that these verses are from different hands. Perhaps though, as support to the first approach we can note the emphasis on the singular in the lodge, וַיִּפְתַּח הָאֶחָד אֶת-שַׂקּוֹ vs the emphasis in Yaakov’s house on the fact that each had the problem, אִישׁ צְרוֹר-כַּסְפּוֹ, בְּשַׂקּו. Still, it really does not read well. Suggestions appreciated.

A guten shabbos and Channuka to all.